Menadżer aktualizacji vs apt

[dedito]

0

Na tym polegają  "PhasedUpdates" https://ubuntu.com/server/docs/about-apt...ed-updates :

How does it actually work?
Phased updates depend on a value derived from your machine’s “Machine ID”, as well as the package name and package version. The neat thing about this is that phasing is determined completely at the client end; no identifiable information (or indeed any new information at all) is ever sent to the server to achieve update phasing.

When the software update is released, the initial subset of machines to receive the update first is chosen at random. Only if there are no problems detected by the first set of users will the update be made available to everyone.

więc jeśli dobrze rozumiem powyższe, może się zdarzyć, że ponowne odświeżenie bazy pakietów przyniesie nowe aktualizacje.
Od jakiegoś czasu apt też korzysta z "PhasedUpdates"

starting with Ubuntu 21.04, apt also uses phased updates, allowing phased updates to apply to all versions of Ubuntu, including Ubuntu Server and Ubuntu running in containers. Incidentally, this change also resulted in the now-infamous "The following packages have been kept back" message from apt during many system updates. While phased updates in apt have been a thing since Ubuntu 21.04, they have come to light most clearly in Ubuntu 22.04 LTS

więc jeśli go nie wyłączysz w apt to wybór pomiędzy apt i menadżerem aktualizacji imho nie będzie mieć większego sensu (oczywiście jeśli używasz najnowszego Minta).